Skip to main content

Designated Gifts Contributed to Individuals

IRS Publication 526 prohibits contributions to individuals. "You cannot deduct contributions to specific individuals, including the following.
-- Contributions to individuals who are needy or worthy. This includes contributions to a qualified organization if you indicate that your contribution is for a specific person. But you can deduct a contribution that you give to a qualified organization that in turn helps needy or worthy individuals if you do not indicate that your contribution is for a specific person.
-- Expenses you paid for another person who provided services to a qualified organization. For Example. Your son does missionary work. You pay his expenses. You cannot claim a deduction for your son's unreimbursed expenses related to his contribution of services."

Unfortunately, IRS publications cannot address every scenario that might be presented. Here's one: A church member designates a contribution to a specific ministry or minister supported by the church. Generally, these contributions are permitted. In these cases, the individual eventually receiving the contribution is an employee or independent contractor of the church or Christian ministy (e.g. a foreign mission organization). As such, the payment represents taxable compensation. Common examples include special collections in support of a local church minister, and those in support of a missionary publicly acknowledged by the church as leading a ministry worthy of the congregation's prayer and financial support.

A couple of suggestions that I offer in these unusual situations:
1. The payment to the designated minister or ministry should made by check or wire transfer directly to that individual or the organization sponsoring his or her Christian ministry. As such, either the church or the sponsoring organization will issue the appropriate IRS information return (typically a Form W-2 or Form 1099-Misc) to the recipient.
2. Be careful to avoid situations in which the substantial majority of the church's payment comes from a donor related to the recipient. Again, IRS Publication 526 denies contribution for which the donor receives or expects to receive a benefit--I would include in this category payments among related parties for whom they might otherwise feel obligated to support. I state this position as follows: "The church or charity must be careful not to become a conduit for recharacterizing otherwise nondeductible personal expenses into charitable contributions." Of course, the church may forward funds to any individual if the sole intent is to maintain the anonymity of a donor who will not be receiving a tax deductible receipt.
3. One final example that seems to come up a lot and, in my experience, receives a wide variety of treatment... My reading of the IRS rules and regulation would allow a tax deduction to donors for contributions to funds maintained by charitable organizations for the support of individuals pursuing missions and other trips designed to fulfill ministry purposes. To the extent that the funds are used for 1) travel, 2) meals and 3) lodging during the trip, they will not be taxable to the recipient. The organization should issue the appropriate information return when the payments exceed these actual costs. For recordkeeping sake, I recommend that the organization handle all disbursement of funds for these three qualifying uses.

I wish that I could be more specific, but there appears to be little other guidance provided by the IRS and court cases. I believe that I am advising in both the letter and spirit of the law.

Comments

  1. Mr. Pfaffe,

    Your guidance here seems to answer a debate we're having among our leadership right now, though your answer doesn't seem to support "my side" of the debate. Can I ask you regarding two specific instances just to make sure that I understand? You'll be doing a great service to our treasurer...

    We have a disabled woman in our church who is much-loved and does a great amount of work for our church and the kingdom of God. Since she has been disabled, several people in the community at large have been sending us regular gifts for her. None of these people are close relatives and none of them are employers (she doesn't "work"). We've been disbursing this money to her monthly (about $300). We do not issue her a W-2 or 1099 or anything of the sort and there isn't anything that she's expected to "do" as a result. Is this illegal? (and if so, would it be more kosher if we used the funds to pay her bills instead of giving it to her directly?)

    2nd situation: We have a disabled teenager who needs a new wheelchair. We have a "wheelchair fund" which people are giving to in order to buy her a new chair. Is this illegal?

    Thank you so much for this blog. I'm bookmarking it and reading your past posts!

    Pastor Travis

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Qualified Small Employer HRAs

On December 13, 2016, President Obama signed the 21st Century Cures Act, allowing qualified small employers to offer Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRA) that follow certain terms.

After the Affordable Care Act was passed, the IRS originally determined that an HRA was not a qualified group health plan. The Cures Act overrules this decision. HRAs are again an option for qualifying small employers.

To be eligible, the small employer must have fewer than 50 employees and must not offer a group health plan to any of its employees.

The Qualified Small Employer Health Reimbursement Arrangement (QSEHRA) must be subject to the following terms.
No salary reduction contributions may be made (i.e., 100% employer-funded).Employer must receive proof of employee’s minimum essential coverage.Reimbursements must be for qualifying medical expenses.Reimbursements for any year cannot exceed $4,950 (or $10,000 for family coverage), which will be adjusted annually for inflation.Employer must offer the …

Revised Form I-9 Released

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services released a revised Form I-9. All new hires after January 21, 2017, must complete the revised Form I-9. All prior released versions of Form I-9 will be invalid for new hires.

Employers are required to have a completed hard copy of Form I-9 on file for each employee. Current employees do not need to re-complete the revised form.

More information on Form I-9 can be found on the USCIS website.

Housing Allowance when Bartering for Rent Payments

Question:

If a minister rents his principal residence, but he performs services (mowing the lawn, repairing the roof, etc.) in lieu of rent, can he still qualify the rent amount for a housing allowance tax benefit?

Answer:

Of course, bartering income is taxable. The Internal Revenue Code interprets that above situation as follows: tenant/minister receives taxable income for the fair market value of the services he provides, andtenant/minster pays landlord for renal of residence. The minister in this case reports taxable income for services provided in lieu of rent. It is also likely subject to self-employment tax. He may then claim as qualifying housing allowance expense equal to the amount he "pays" for rent of his personal residence. Essentially, there is no difference than if the minister and his landlord simply traded checks.

See a past MinistryCPA post regarding this topic: http://ministrycpa.blogspot.com/2016/09/services-to-church-in-lieu-of-rent-of.html