Skip to main content

Donor Control Over Gifts to Churches

Question:

How much influence may donors exercise on the disbursement of church benevolent funds that they have contributed to?

Answer:

As members of a local church congregation, donors to benevolent funds may help to identify and encourage the church's aid of individuals in need just as those who do not contribute may. Often, donors to these type of funds are among the more sensitive to observing these needs so it is not surprising that they may be the originators of discussions by the church leadership to consider making benevolent disbursements.

Having said this, the process must be an open one. Clearly, once funds are donated they must be fully under the control of the church. The church must be very careful to avoid becoming a conduit for donor "contributions" that really satisfy their own personal obligations. For example, a donor's gift that is designated to pay her granddaughter's Bible camp admission or youth activity to visit the local amusement park is not a deductible contribution. The church may assist the grandmother in maintaining her anonymity, if that is the underlying purpose for the gift, but should not issue a receipt for tax deduction purposes.

Let's change the scenario a little bit. Imagine, instead, that the church congregation decides to establish a designated gift fund to enable children of financially challenged families to attend Bible camp. The grandmother makes a contribution to the fund. Unbeknownst to her (or at least without her direct influence), her granddaughter qualifies and receives assistance. This will not deny tax deductibility. This scenario can repeat itself in multiple situations (e.g. missions or church planting support to ministries of church members' families, scholarship funds).

Donors should not exercise control over the disbursement of these funds. Further, if the disbursements are predominately funded by a recipient's family member, even if others contribute in small amounts, the church should assure itself that the disbursements are truly reflective of church action and endorsement. Let me repeat, the church must be very careful to avoid becoming a conduit for donor "contributions" that really satisfy their own personal obligations.

Comments

  1. Well stated. Thank you for both types of outcomes to the giving of a fund and how it is dispersed.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Qualified Small Employer HRAs

On December 13, 2016, President Obama signed the 21st Century Cures Act, allowing qualified small employers to offer Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRA) that follow certain terms.

After the Affordable Care Act was passed, the IRS originally determined that an HRA was not a qualified group health plan. The Cures Act overrules this decision. HRAs are again an option for qualifying small employers.

To be eligible, the small employer must have fewer than 50 employees and must not offer a group health plan to any of its employees.

The Qualified Small Employer Health Reimbursement Arrangement (QSEHRA) must be subject to the following terms.
No salary reduction contributions may be made (i.e., 100% employer-funded).Employer must receive proof of employee’s minimum essential coverage.Reimbursements must be for qualifying medical expenses.Reimbursements for any year cannot exceed $4,950 (or $10,000 for family coverage), which will be adjusted annually for inflation.Employer must offer the …

Housing Allowance when Bartering for Rent Payments

Question:

If a minister rents his principal residence, but he performs services (mowing the lawn, repairing the roof, etc.) in lieu of rent, can he still qualify the rent amount for a housing allowance tax benefit?

Answer:

Of course, bartering income is taxable. The Internal Revenue Code interprets that above situation as follows: tenant/minister receives taxable income for the fair market value of the services he provides, andtenant/minster pays landlord for renal of residence. The minister in this case reports taxable income for services provided in lieu of rent. It is also likely subject to self-employment tax. He may then claim as qualifying housing allowance expense equal to the amount he "pays" for rent of his personal residence. Essentially, there is no difference than if the minister and his landlord simply traded checks.

See a past MinistryCPA post regarding this topic: http://ministrycpa.blogspot.com/2016/09/services-to-church-in-lieu-of-rent-of.html

Mission Trips Involving Both Charitable and Personal Time

Question:

A church group went on a two-week mission trip, and a few of the members stayed an additional two weeks for personal time. Will the members who stayed the two additional weeks be able to deduct expenses from the trip?

Answer:

IRS Pub 526 covers the topic of Charitable Contributions and, more specifically, travel expenses associated with charitable trips. The publication states that travel expenses will be deductible “if there is no significant element of personal pleasure, recreation, or vacation in the travel.” The publication also states, “The deduction for travel expenses won't be denied simply because you enjoy providing services to the charitable organization. Even if you enjoy the trip, you can take a charitable contribution deduction for your travel expenses if you are on duty in a genuine and substantial sense throughout the trip. However, if you have only nominal duties, or if for significant parts of the trip you don't have any duties, you can't deduct you…