Skip to main content

"Net Income" Rules for a Non-Profit


Is a non-profit organization (NPO) allowed to make a profit during the year? If yes, is there a limit on the amount of income that can be carried over from year to year?


A NPO is allowed to have an excess of revenues over expenditures in a given year or accounting period, and there is no specific cap set by the Internal Revenue Code. Generally, NPOs refer to this condition as a net increase, because it is simply an increase in funds available for use in furthering the organization's exempt purpose. However, NPOs should be aware of the following IRS guidelines regarding sources and uses of funds.

Unrelated Business Income Tax
Revenues derived from sources unrelated to the organization's exempt purpose may be subject to unrelated business income tax (UBIT). IRS Publication 598 covers the basics of unrelated business income tax. Also, our January 10, 2011 blog post lays out some specific IRS standards regarding UBIT considerations.

Private Inurement:
Courts have coined the term "private inurement" to describe when a NPOs money or other assets are devoted to private uses by insiders instead of the charitable purposes they were intended for.

According to the IRS, "No part of the net earnings of a section 501(c)(3) organization may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. A private shareholder or individual is a person having a personal and private interest in the activities of the organization."

NPOs must carefully direct and document use of their funds toward clearly identified exempt purposes. Exempt purposes can be a nebulous term, but organizations that have applied for and received tax-exempt status from the IRS must have clearly stated purposes and should use any excess funds towards those purposes, rather than for the benefit of any private individuals. Specific uses of funds are at the discretion of the organization and its directors, but furthering the exempt purpose should always be the end goal. See this previous blog post for more on private inurement.

Designated Funds:
To answer the second question, it is very common for NPOs to report a substantial excess of revenues over expenditures in a Designated Fund. A Designated Fund is a specific fund used to finance or support an identified cause.

Designated Funds can either be initiated by the NPO or by a charitable donor. For example, a local church (the NPO) recently started raising estimated funds of $1 million for the construction of a new auditorium. The charitable donor can give money to be used specifically for the auditorium; the church cannot use the designated money for another purpose.

Let's say that at the end of the fiscal year, the church has raised $300,000 for the purpose of an auditorium. In this situation, the church may appear to have a very large "profit." However, as long as the money is designated for the purpose of the auditorium, the $300,000 increases a  "Designated Fund" which must be carried into the following year.


Popular posts from this blog

Qualified Small Employer HRAs

On December 13, 2016, President Obama signed the 21st Century Cures Act, allowing qualified small employers to offer Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRA) that follow certain terms.

After the Affordable Care Act was passed, the IRS originally determined that an HRA was not a qualified group health plan. The Cures Act overrules this decision. HRAs are again an option for qualifying small employers.

To be eligible, the small employer must have fewer than 50 employees and must not offer a group health plan to any of its employees.

The Qualified Small Employer Health Reimbursement Arrangement (QSEHRA) must be subject to the following terms.
No salary reduction contributions may be made (i.e., 100% employer-funded).Employer must receive proof of employee’s minimum essential coverage.Reimbursements must be for qualifying medical expenses.Reimbursements for any year cannot exceed $4,950 (or $10,000 for family coverage), which will be adjusted annually for inflation.Employer must offer the …

Housing Allowance when Bartering for Rent Payments


If a minister rents his principal residence, but he performs services (mowing the lawn, repairing the roof, etc.) in lieu of rent, can he still qualify the rent amount for a housing allowance tax benefit?


Of course, bartering income is taxable. The Internal Revenue Code interprets that above situation as follows: tenant/minister receives taxable income for the fair market value of the services he provides, andtenant/minster pays landlord for renal of residence. The minister in this case reports taxable income for services provided in lieu of rent. It is also likely subject to self-employment tax. He may then claim as qualifying housing allowance expense equal to the amount he "pays" for rent of his personal residence. Essentially, there is no difference than if the minister and his landlord simply traded checks.

See a past MinistryCPA post regarding this topic:

Mission Trips Involving Both Charitable and Personal Time


A church group went on a two-week mission trip, and a few of the members stayed an additional two weeks for personal time. Will the members who stayed the two additional weeks be able to deduct expenses from the trip?


IRS Pub 526 covers the topic of Charitable Contributions and, more specifically, travel expenses associated with charitable trips. The publication states that travel expenses will be deductible “if there is no significant element of personal pleasure, recreation, or vacation in the travel.” The publication also states, “The deduction for travel expenses won't be denied simply because you enjoy providing services to the charitable organization. Even if you enjoy the trip, you can take a charitable contribution deduction for your travel expenses if you are on duty in a genuine and substantial sense throughout the trip. However, if you have only nominal duties, or if for significant parts of the trip you don't have any duties, you can't deduct you…