Skip to main content

Switch to Roth IRA from 403(b) Church Retirement Plan

Question:

A church is currently contributing $6,000 per year to an Internal Revenue Code section 403(b) retirement plan for its pastor. He wants the church to stop putting that money into the 403(b) and start putting it into Roth IRAs for himself and his wife. Can the church pay for Roths for himself and his wife even if the wife is not an employee of the church? This benefits the pastor in that he sets aside tax-free income when he retires, but of course, he loses the tax deferment of the 403(b). Are there any other negatives for the pastor in making this move?

Answer:

Since standard Roth IRA plans are not employer plans, the arrangement discussed above will be treated as if the church had given the $6,000 as additional compensation to the pastor and he subsequently invested the funds into Roth IRAs for he and his wife. The church will simply facilitate his personal investment choices. The $6,000 would be reported as taxable compensation in Box 1 of his Form W-2 and no longer excluded from tax (nor listed as an elective deferred in Box 12a).

For ministers who have not opted out of self-employment tax, they lose not only the reduction of taxable income enjoyed by contributors to 403(b) plans, they no longer may exclude the contribution from SE income on Schedule SE. In effect, the change costs these ministers 15.3 percent of their retirement plan contributions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Church Car Purchase for Pastor

Question: A church would like to purchase a car for the pastor's use. What is the best method to accomplish this goal? Should the car be titled in the pastor's name? What will be the tax consequences of this arrangement? Answer: The church has two main alternatives for this purchase:  Title the car in the pastor's name and reimburse him for business expenses Title it in the church's name and treat personal use as taxable compensation There are fewer immediate tax consequences for the latter. Since both are viable options, we will discuss both situations in this post. If the church chooses to give the car to the pastor and register it in his name, he is free to use it for whatever personal use he desires with no tax consequences. However, the fair value of the car is taxable as compensation at the time it is given to the pastor. Internal Revenue Code section 102(c) clearly states that gifts given to employees by their employers are taxable compensation. The...

Rental of a Church Parsonage to a Non-Minister

Question: A church owns a parsonage, but the pastor does not use it as he owns his own home. The church rents the parsonage to a tenant other than a minister or employee of the church. Will the church be responsible for paying income tax on these monies as Unrelated Business Income (filing a Form 990-T) even if the money is used to carry on the business of the church? Answer: Whether the money is used for church purposes is irrelevant.  IRS Publication 598  states: "If an exempt organization regularly carries on a trade or business not substantially related to its exempt purpose, except that it provides funds to carry out that purpose, the organization is subject to tax on its income from that unrelated trade or business." Fortunately, in the case of rental income from real property, such income is "excluded in computing unrelated business taxable income" (Publication 598). Caution: see content below regarding debt-financed property.  However, a second concern not a...

Can Form 4361 be filed after the deadline?

Question:   Is it possible to opt out of Social Security after the 2-year deadline? Answer:  Unlike other employees, a licensed or ordained minister has the option to opt out of Social Security and Medicare (FICA). If a minister wants to opt out they must file Form 4361 by the tax deadline including extension, in the second year in which they have received ministerial income of $400 or more. This election is final, and the minister cannot opt back into FICA taxes.  At MinistryCPA, we have received questions from ministers who have exceeded the two year deadline and desire to opt-out. There have been several court cases which provide guidance in answering this question. Some have argued that the minister was unaware of the deadline, had mistakenly believed they had filed a timely election, were given incorrect advice by an IRS employee, or their opposition to participate in Social Security and Medicare did not arise until after the 2-year deadline had passed. In each of th...