Skip to main content

Qualified Small Employer HRAs

By Anonymous
On December 13, 2016, President Obama signed the 21st Century Cures Act, allowing qualified small employers to offer Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRA) that follow certain terms.

After the Affordable Care Act was passed, the IRS originally determined that an HRA was not a qualified group health plan. The Cures Act overrules this decision. HRAs are again an option for qualifying small employers.

To be eligible, the small employer must have fewer than 50 employees and must not offer a group health plan to any of its employees.

The Qualified Small Employer Health Reimbursement Arrangement (QSEHRA) must be subject to the following terms.
  • No salary reduction contributions may be made (i.e., 100% employer-funded).
  • Employer must receive proof of employee’s minimum essential coverage.
  • Reimbursements must be for qualifying medical expenses.
  • Reimbursements for any year cannot exceed $4,950 (or $10,000 for family coverage), which will be adjusted annually for inflation.
  • Employer must offer the same terms to all eligible employees.
  • Employees receiving a monthly premium assistance credit (under Code Sec. 36B) are not eligible employees.
  • Employer must follow additional requirements as outlined in the Act, if applicable.
Beginning with the 2017 calendar year, the employer will report (in January 2018) the benefit amount of the QSEHRA on employees’ Forms W-2. The IRS will likely issue additional guidance in the coming months.

When an employer provides a monthly QSEHRA, the employee is not eligible for the premium assistance tax credit because this would be “double-dipping” tax-free benefits. Despite this limitation, there are many employers who can use the QSEHRA as a tax-free medical benefit.

The complete (and very wordy) 21st Century Cures Act can be found here. Section 18001 of the Act discusses the QSEHRA.
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousJanuary 26, 2017 at 3:16 PM

    Thank you for this information. As you said, the law is very wordy. One thing I am uncertain about: if a church was going to include in Salary on the W-2 the extra portion given to cover health expenses, is this still applicable for 2016? It is not clear to me if that would be taxable or not any more for 2016, given their statement for retroactively reducing the tax burden. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousApril 13, 2017 at 10:33 PM

    This is an another example of a conundrum created by the stop and start implementation of the ACC. This requires each ministry to carefully consider its unique circumstances and seek professional help if necessary.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Church Car Purchase for Pastor

By
Question: A church would like to purchase a car for the pastor's use. What is the best method to accomplish this goal? Should the car be titled in the pastor's name? What will be the tax consequences of this arrangement? Answer: The church has two main alternatives for this purchase:  Title the car in the pastor's name and reimburse him for business expenses Title it in the church's name and treat personal use as taxable compensation There are fewer immediate tax consequences for the latter. Since both are viable options, we will discuss both situations in this post. If the church chooses to give the car to the pastor and register it in his name, he is free to use it for whatever personal use he desires with no tax consequences. However, the fair value of the car is taxable as compensation at the time it is given to the pastor. Internal Revenue Code section 102(c) clearly states that gifts given to employees by their employers are taxable compensation. The...
2 comments
Read more

Can Form 4361 be filed after the deadline?

By
Question:   Is it possible to opt out of Social Security after the 2-year deadline? Answer:  Unlike other employees, a licensed or ordained minister has the option to opt out of Social Security and Medicare (FICA). If a minister wants to opt out they must file Form 4361 by the tax deadline including extension, in the second year in which they have received ministerial income of $400 or more. This election is final, and the minister cannot opt back into FICA taxes.  At MinistryCPA, we have received questions from ministers who have exceeded the two year deadline and desire to opt-out. There have been several court cases which provide guidance in answering this question. Some have argued that the minister was unaware of the deadline, had mistakenly believed they had filed a timely election, were given incorrect advice by an IRS employee, or their opposition to participate in Social Security and Medicare did not arise until after the 2-year deadline had passed. In each of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rental of a Church Parsonage to a Non-Minister

By
Question: A church owns a parsonage, but the pastor does not use it as he owns his own home. The church rents the parsonage to a tenant other than a minister or employee of the church. Will the church be responsible for paying income tax on these monies as Unrelated Business Income (filing a Form 990-T) even if the money is used to carry on the business of the church? Answer: Whether the money is used for church purposes is irrelevant.  IRS Publication 598  states: "If an exempt organization regularly carries on a trade or business not substantially related to its exempt purpose, except that it provides funds to carry out that purpose, the organization is subject to tax on its income from that unrelated trade or business." Fortunately, in the case of rental income from real property, such income is "excluded in computing unrelated business taxable income" (Publication 598). Caution: see content below regarding debt-financed property.  However, a second concern not a...
Post a Comment
Read more