Skip to main content

Employee or Independent Contractor

Question:

A 501(c)(3) organization recently accepted the services of a married couple. This married couple does not receive compensation from the organization, but does receive donations from individuals who designate their donations to the organization on behalf of the couple. The organization controls the hours and projects of the couple. Should this couple be considered as employees or as independent contractors?

Answer:

There is strong motivation for nonprofit and for-profit organizations to treat their employees as non-employees. Typically non-employees are excluded from benefits available to employees (therefore, reducing organizations' costs). An April 21, 2009, blog post explained the IRS position on the classification of church workers. These same principles apply to all 501(c)(3) organizations:

"In most cases, non-ministerial church workers (individuals who are not performing the functions of a minister) should be classified as employees and subject to FICA withholding (and matching by the church) and income tax withholding. A common situation when independent contractor status is appropriate relates to a church employing a janitorial or other service firm to render services. On the other hand, the typical church janitor, office employee, etc. should not be treated as an independent contractor." (This quote is from one of many blog posts that readers will find by typing "Independent Contractor" in the above Search Window.)

In the question reproduced above, the married couple will most likely be considered employees per the IRS classification of an employee: "Under common-law rules, anyone who performs services for you is your employee if you can control what will be done and how it will be done. This is so even when you give the employee freedom of action. What matters is that you have the right to control the details of how the services are performed." (IRS website article entitled, "Independent Contractor (Self-Employed) or Employee?").
 
Once the church determines the employee vs. independent contractor classification of the couple, it must address a second issue: whether the workers are performing ministerial or non-ministerial services. These classifications have implications which are also covered thoroughly in previous (other) blog posts.

* 501(c)(3) organizations are tax-exempt not-for-profits described in the Internal Revenue Code Section 501, subparagraph c, subsection 3, hence the name "501(c)(3) organization."

Comments

  1. Can you clarify employment status on the above situation if the 501(c)(3) organization did not control the hours/projects of the couple? Additionally, the husband is an ordained minister of the Gospel, who performs ministerial duties such as evangelism, discipleship, preaching and so forth.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good follow-up question, Chris. Controlling the hours/projects of the couple is just one factor to consider. This blog post (http://bit.ly/1oERDdE) highlights topics from IRS Form SS-8 that may be of interest to you. We suggest you seek professional assistance because facts and circumstances of your case would need to be fully determined.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Church Car Purchase for Pastor

Question: A church would like to purchase a car for the pastor's use. What is the best method to accomplish this goal? Should the car be titled in the pastor's name? What will be the tax consequences of this arrangement? Answer: The church has two main alternatives for this purchase:  Title the car in the pastor's name and reimburse him for business expenses Title it in the church's name and treat personal use as taxable compensation There are fewer immediate tax consequences for the latter. Since both are viable options, we will discuss both situations in this post. If the church chooses to give the car to the pastor and register it in his name, he is free to use it for whatever personal use he desires with no tax consequences. However, the fair value of the car is taxable as compensation at the time it is given to the pastor. Internal Revenue Code section 102(c) clearly states that gifts given to employees by their employers are taxable compensation. The...

Rental of a Church Parsonage to a Non-Minister

Question: A church owns a parsonage, but the pastor does not use it as he owns his own home. The church rents the parsonage to a tenant other than a minister or employee of the church. Will the church be responsible for paying income tax on these monies as Unrelated Business Income (filing a Form 990-T) even if the money is used to carry on the business of the church? Answer: Whether the money is used for church purposes is irrelevant.  IRS Publication 598  states: "If an exempt organization regularly carries on a trade or business not substantially related to its exempt purpose, except that it provides funds to carry out that purpose, the organization is subject to tax on its income from that unrelated trade or business." Fortunately, in the case of rental income from real property, such income is "excluded in computing unrelated business taxable income" (Publication 598). Caution: see content below regarding debt-financed property.  However, a second concern not a...

Can Form 4361 be filed after the deadline?

Question:   Is it possible to opt out of Social Security after the 2-year deadline? Answer:  Unlike other employees, a licensed or ordained minister has the option to opt out of Social Security and Medicare (FICA). If a minister wants to opt out they must file Form 4361 by the tax deadline including extension, in the second year in which they have received ministerial income of $400 or more. This election is final, and the minister cannot opt back into FICA taxes.  At MinistryCPA, we have received questions from ministers who have exceeded the two year deadline and desire to opt-out. There have been several court cases which provide guidance in answering this question. Some have argued that the minister was unaware of the deadline, had mistakenly believed they had filed a timely election, were given incorrect advice by an IRS employee, or their opposition to participate in Social Security and Medicare did not arise until after the 2-year deadline had passed. In each of th...