Skip to main content

Patrick Lencioni's "The Ideal Team Player" -- Strategic Planning at MinistryCPA

Patrick Lencioni (Len-chō’-nē), author of The Ideal Team Player, and two other books we’ve used at MinistryCPA—The Advantage and The Five Dysfunctions of a Team—purports to have identified the three essential virtues of the ideal team player. He says that he found that the ideal team player is 1) hungry, 2) smart, and 3) humble.

The Bible prophet Micah confronted his rebellious listeners. He taught them the virtues that would truly bring pleasure to God (chapter 6, verse 8): “He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to 1) do justly, and to 2) love mercy, and to 3) walk humbly with thy God?” Carefully studied, these characteristics are identical—they are not Lencioni’s sole 21st Century discovery.

Nevertheless, Lencioni does offer much that is helpful in practical application to recruit and select ideal team players and to assist current team members with flaws (and we all have them) so that we might overcome them.

Micah instructs the team player who wants to grow into an ideal contributor to “do justly”—to take action and to do so with energy and fidelity on behalf of those who entrust him or her to contribute to the team. Lencioni describes this person as hungry. He says that these people are “self-motivated and diligent. [They exhibit] a manageable and sustainable commitment to doing a job well and going above and beyond when it is truly required” (p. 159).

Micah continued: The God-pleaser must “love mercy.” His compassion (Amplified Bible) truly helps others, even if it means risking frank, but tactful, confrontation. Lencioni calls these people smart—people smart. They demonstrate a common sense about people, by “asking good questions, listening to what others are saying, and staying engaged in conversations intently. [They have] good judgment [regarding] the impact of their words and actions. They don’t say and do things—or fail to say and do things—without knowing the likely response of their colleagues” (p. 160).

Finally, Micah challenges the individual who would bring pleasure to God to walk humbly. As far as team dynamics go, Lencioni says that ideal team players “share credit, emphasize team over self, and define success collectively rather than individually” (p. 157). Lencioni says that blatantly arrogant people are easy to spot. But he believes that humility can show up in a much less disruptive way that is nonetheless harmful to team success. These people “lack self-confidence [and] tend to discount their own talents and contributions” (p. 158). Lencioni quotes C.S. Lewis: “Humility isn’t thinking less of yourself, but thinking of yourself less.”

Lencioni offers a self-assessment device that can help an organization’s team members identify their own strengths and weaknesses as team players and those of current and prospective colleagues. MinistryCPA employs a modified version of his device to establish baselines and track improvement related to our Core Values. Borrowing from Lencioni’s Five Dysfunctions definition of a healthy organization, MinistryCPA people understand that...

A healthy organization is led by people who 1) trust one another enough to be vulnerable, 2) engage in productive conflict, 3) commit to a course of action, 4) hold one another accountable to perform and behave consistent with the organization’s best interests at heart, and 5) focus on achieving the organization’s goals.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Church Car Purchase for Pastor

Question: A church would like to purchase a car for the pastor's use. What is the best method to accomplish this goal? Should the car be titled in the pastor's name? What will be the tax consequences of this arrangement? Answer: The church has two main alternatives for this purchase:  Title the car in the pastor's name and reimburse him for business expenses Title it in the church's name and treat personal use as taxable compensation There are fewer immediate tax consequences for the latter. Since both are viable options, we will discuss both situations in this post. If the church chooses to give the car to the pastor and register it in his name, he is free to use it for whatever personal use he desires with no tax consequences. However, the fair value of the car is taxable as compensation at the time it is given to the pastor. Internal Revenue Code section 102(c) clearly states that gifts given to employees by their employers are taxable compensation. The...

Rental of a Church Parsonage to a Non-Minister

Question: A church owns a parsonage, but the pastor does not use it as he owns his own home. The church rents the parsonage to a tenant other than a minister or employee of the church. Will the church be responsible for paying income tax on these monies as Unrelated Business Income (filing a Form 990-T) even if the money is used to carry on the business of the church? Answer: Whether the money is used for church purposes is irrelevant.  IRS Publication 598  states: "If an exempt organization regularly carries on a trade or business not substantially related to its exempt purpose, except that it provides funds to carry out that purpose, the organization is subject to tax on its income from that unrelated trade or business." Fortunately, in the case of rental income from real property, such income is "excluded in computing unrelated business taxable income" (Publication 598). Caution: see content below regarding debt-financed property.  However, a second concern not a...

Can Form 4361 be filed after the deadline?

Question:   Is it possible to opt out of Social Security after the 2-year deadline? Answer:  Unlike other employees, a licensed or ordained minister has the option to opt out of Social Security and Medicare (FICA). If a minister wants to opt out they must file Form 4361 by the tax deadline including extension, in the second year in which they have received ministerial income of $400 or more. This election is final, and the minister cannot opt back into FICA taxes.  At MinistryCPA, we have received questions from ministers who have exceeded the two year deadline and desire to opt-out. There have been several court cases which provide guidance in answering this question. Some have argued that the minister was unaware of the deadline, had mistakenly believed they had filed a timely election, were given incorrect advice by an IRS employee, or their opposition to participate in Social Security and Medicare did not arise until after the 2-year deadline had passed. In each of th...