Skip to main content

How have Small Businesses Weathered Covid? (a June 2021 outlook)

By

Over the past year MinistryCPA has taken part in a small business survey from the United States Census Bureau. The survey compiled information from millions of small business owners to analyze how Covid impacted small businesses in different states. If you would like to look at the data for yourself, you can follow the link to the United States Census Bureau Website.  

Change in Revenues

Many small businesses experienced a change in revenue over the past year. In June of 2020, 19.7% of small businesses said that they saw growth in their revenues during the previous month. However, at the same time 42.6% said that they had a decrease in revenue. Certain states struggled more than others. A higher percentage of businesses in California, Nevada, and Wyoming were experiencing less revenue. In those states approximately 47% of small businesses had seen a decrease in revenue.

The results of June 2021 tell a significantly different story. 11.2% of businesses said that they had an increase in revenue during the previous month. In the same period, only 20.3% of businesses said that they had a decrease in revenue. Similar to June of 2020 there were a few states struggling more than others. In Louisiana, Georgia, and West Virginia 23%-25% of small businesses saw a decrease in revenue.

Change in Employees

The US Census Bureau also sought to determine how many small businesses experienced a change in their number of employees. The national averages comparing June 2020 and June 2021 were similar (8.9% and 9.7% respectively, increased employment in the prior month, and 11.7% and 8.2% respectively, reported a decrease). In  California, Nevada, New Jersey, Kentucky, and Michigan, approximately twice as many small businesses reduced their number of employees leading up to June 2020 and 2021 (25% and 29% respectively). Covid had a large impact on businesses, and states with stricter regulations experienced a larger decrease in small business employment.

Overall Effect 

The last category of interest is small business leaders' perceptions of Covid and its effect. During June of 2020, 37.7% of business respondents believed Covid was having a large negative effect on their business. That number significantly dropped to 25.5% of small business respondents by June 2021. However, 52% of small businesses in California, Nevada, New York, Michigan, Illinois, Georgia, and Texas believed in June 2021 that they continued to be negatively impacted by Covid.

Small business leaders who are in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Oregon, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, and Arkansas reported very different perceptions of Covid in June 2021. There, 55%-65% of small business respondents believe that Covid no longer had an impact on their business. 

Overall, this survey has provided intriguing information that can help us to understand how Covid has impacted states and small businesses. There is no denying that Covid has changed how many businesses operate. It will be interesting to see what additional changes come as time goes on. 




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Church Car Purchase for Pastor

By
Question: A church would like to purchase a car for the pastor's use. What is the best method to accomplish this goal? Should the car be titled in the pastor's name? What will be the tax consequences of this arrangement? Answer: The church has two main alternatives for this purchase:  Title the car in the pastor's name and reimburse him for business expenses Title it in the church's name and treat personal use as taxable compensation There are fewer immediate tax consequences for the latter. Since both are viable options, we will discuss both situations in this post. If the church chooses to give the car to the pastor and register it in his name, he is free to use it for whatever personal use he desires with no tax consequences. However, the fair value of the car is taxable as compensation at the time it is given to the pastor. Internal Revenue Code section 102(c) clearly states that gifts given to employees by their employers are taxable compensation. The...
2 comments
Read more

Rental of a Church Parsonage to a Non-Minister

By
Question: A church owns a parsonage, but the pastor does not use it as he owns his own home. The church rents the parsonage to a tenant other than a minister or employee of the church. Will the church be responsible for paying income tax on these monies as Unrelated Business Income (filing a Form 990-T) even if the money is used to carry on the business of the church? Answer: Whether the money is used for church purposes is irrelevant.  IRS Publication 598  states: "If an exempt organization regularly carries on a trade or business not substantially related to its exempt purpose, except that it provides funds to carry out that purpose, the organization is subject to tax on its income from that unrelated trade or business." Fortunately, in the case of rental income from real property, such income is "excluded in computing unrelated business taxable income" (Publication 598). Caution: see content below regarding debt-financed property.  However, a second concern not a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Can Form 4361 be filed after the deadline?

By
Question:   Is it possible to opt out of Social Security after the 2-year deadline? Answer:  Unlike other employees, a licensed or ordained minister has the option to opt out of Social Security and Medicare (FICA). If a minister wants to opt out they must file Form 4361 by the tax deadline including extension, in the second year in which they have received ministerial income of $400 or more. This election is final, and the minister cannot opt back into FICA taxes.  At MinistryCPA, we have received questions from ministers who have exceeded the two year deadline and desire to opt-out. There have been several court cases which provide guidance in answering this question. Some have argued that the minister was unaware of the deadline, had mistakenly believed they had filed a timely election, were given incorrect advice by an IRS employee, or their opposition to participate in Social Security and Medicare did not arise until after the 2-year deadline had passed. In each of th...
Post a Comment
Read more